Lost somewhere, sometime along the way?
I woke up this morning and I was
feeling bad. (Don't worry, I'm not going to grab the guitar and sing
The Blues, at least not yet).
It felt as if I was living a great
Blues lyric, Sunday Morning Coming Down - “Then I washed my
face and combed my hair, And stumbled down the stairs to meet the
day.” It was a Thursday.
I passed the central heating controls
and flipped the heating on. It was May 30th. Had there been a
climate change professor, a climate change Nazi, a climate change
guru or a climate change capitalist with bulging pockets handy I
would have gleefully chopped them up and put them on the bonfire. I
could have masked the smell with sodden leaves from the garden.
Got breakfast. Heat still on. Braced
myself to walk the dog. Put on my two fleeces, my scarf and my K.C.
Chiefs hat and headed down the path. Dog may have preferred to go
via the football club, but far too cold. Football club walk is
exposed to the north wind.
Got home. Picked up the paper and
turned to the weather section. The EDP is getting clever these days
– burying the weather deep on page 14. It used to be on page two.
Forecast for today – cloudy with high of 11 degrees. Yes, that's
52 degrees F. Wind off the North Sea at 10-20 mph. EDP page 12
headline – Grey skies fail to dampen spirits as thousands flock to
Suffolk Show. (The capacity of English people to delude themselves
never ceases to amaze me – this explains the “stiff upper lip”
- it's frozen in that position!)
Meanwhile on page 11 comes the
startling revelation that the “UK cut the most emissions across the
EU in 2011”. France and Germany also cut theirs. Leader of the
pack was Finland which cut emissions by 10%. Wooden spoon goes to
Bulgaria whose levels rose by 9.6% in the same period. Anyone
spotting a correlation here?
Back at the ranch, the EU is still in
the grip of recession with millions of poor people suffering
unemployment and cuts to their living standards. Any correlation
here?
On page 14 we have an exciting
development at the Wymondham Medical Practice. They have obtained
planning permission to install a “biomass woodchip boiler to
improve its green credentials”. I got confused. I stupidly
thought that by burning wood (a carbon based organic material)
Wymondham Medical would be adding to the greenhouse gasses.
Apparently not. According to my research, burning wood does not
count, because it is carbon extracted from the atmosphere in the
first place to make the tree. Fossil fuels, on the other hand, are
carbon based organic material extracted from the atmosphere millions
of years ago. Clear? It's just a question of time – apparently.
Time to draw breath.
Only a few brave scientists and public
figures question the premise that global warming (if it exists) is
caused by burning fossil fuels. Their concerns are seldom, if ever,
given much publicity. Humans would much rather believe that danger
is imminent and we are, Dad's Army-like, “doomed”.
Recent evidence has thwarted the
climate change brigade. The rise in global temperature has either
stopped or slowed to a trickle in the last five years. Lot's of
carbon is being burned but little seems to be causing any global
warming.
So, in the midst of the coldest spring
in living memory here in the UK what conclusions can we draw?
It's always been super obvious to me
that putting more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere is going to
cause global warming. But, folks who ought to know better seem to
discount the ability of Gaia to cope with fluctuations in atmospheric
carbon. More carbon in the atmosphere enables more plant growth.
More carbon in the atmosphere enables the oceans to absorb more and
oceanic creatures to use it to build shells and coral reefs. (Not
sure? Check out the White Cliffs of Dover!)
Ah, say the nutters – it's not the
change that's important it's the pace of change.
Let's see, how about some historical
evidence. In general the climate has been getting warmer for about
the last 12 000 years. Long before any fossil fuels were being used
– or even discovered. What triggered this warming? You could
spend all day and give yourself a serious Excedrin Headache Number
426 in the process reading about this very question. The theories
are manifold. Some might even have elements of sound thinking in
them. What is beyond dispute is no-one really knows for sure. But
the Ice Age did end and global temperatures began to rise. They are
still rising today.
Without real evidence how about a bit
of logic? Where does the heat for this planet come from? The sun.
Even fervent climate-changers will agree on this. What is then the
most likely source of global warming? The sun.
What can we do to obviate the global
warming if the primary cause is fluctuations in the sun's radiation?
Nothing.
But this does not sell newspapers.
Sine qua non.
No comments:
Post a Comment